I am a 27 year veteran of a very large federal law enforcement agency as well as an Army veteran and work for two different companies as a firearms instructor and armorer. And I'm saying the problem lies not with the hardware but rather the software.
As for your Glock, you could have easily replaced the mag catch without having to seel the guns and buy another.
I am a 27 year veteran of a very large federal law enforcement agency as well as an Army veteran and work for two different companies as a firearms instructor and armorer. And I'm saying the problem lies not with the hardware but rather the software.
As for your Glock, you could have easily replaced the mag catch without having to seel the guns and buy another.
You are partially right. there is a problem with the *software at SIG gaslighting people about the clear problems with the 320. There is a *Software issue at SIG where they're creating substandard parts and putting them into duty firearms. There is a *Software problem at sig where they are repeatedly putting the wrong parts into firearms, ie (45 cal frame parts into a 9mm frame). There is a *Software issue at SIG with their QC. The *Software problem is creating actual hardware issues.
You must suffer from SSS. Either you're a paid troll for SIG, work at SIG, a bot, or really special with all of the effort you make in defending a single firearm with so many known problems with safety. Or you bought a base 320 and can't afford anything else and are taking it out on everyone else in hopes of getting your org to allow you to use your 320 and in that case I am really sorry for you.
I am a 27 year veteran of a very large federal law enforcement agency as well as an Army veteran and work for two different companies as a firearms instructor and armorer. And I'm saying the problem lies not with the hardware but rather the software.
As for your Glock, you could have easily replaced the mag catch without having to seel the guns and buy another.
You are partially right. there is a problem with the *software at SIG gaslighting people about the clear problems with the 320. There is a *Software issue at SIG where they're creating substandard parts and putting them into duty firearms. There is a *Software problem at sig where they are repeatedly putting the wrong parts into firearms, ie (45 cal frame parts into a 9mm frame). There is a *Software issue at SIG with their QC. The *Software problem is creating actual hardware issues.
David, you are absolutely wrong on all accounts. But you keep drinking from the SDS fountain.
You must suffer from SSS. Either you're a paid troll for SIG, work at SIG, a bot, or really special with all of the effort you make in defending a single firearm with so many known problems with safety. Or you bought a base 320 and can't afford anything else and are taking it out on everyone else in hopes of getting your org to allow you to use your 320 and in that case I am really sorry for you.