PLease allow me to mention citizens are looked at as reasonable — sound mind. Ordinary people. Female guardians I’d think would be evaluated based on size and weight of the bad guy. Versus a female training physical strength so on. A citizens concern for others safety, fear, even his or her own. I wouldn’t think courts believe armed citi…
PLease allow me to mention citizens are looked at as reasonable — sound mind. Ordinary people. Female guardians I’d think would be evaluated based on size and weight of the bad guy. Versus a female training physical strength so on. A citizens concern for others safety, fear, even his or her own. I wouldn’t think courts believe armed citizens whom have never been involved in actual use of force either empty handed or with a weapon. Sure there is training, however, here in my town, Amarillo, I visited a small congregation having no plain clothes security agent. Courts should look at the reasonableness as human error (Murply’s Law) is — it just is. Even if you have excellent knowledge and experience.
PLease allow me to mention citizens are looked at as reasonable — sound mind. Ordinary people. Female guardians I’d think would be evaluated based on size and weight of the bad guy. Versus a female training physical strength so on. A citizens concern for others safety, fear, even his or her own. I wouldn’t think courts believe armed citizens whom have never been involved in actual use of force either empty handed or with a weapon. Sure there is training, however, here in my town, Amarillo, I visited a small congregation having no plain clothes security agent. Courts should look at the reasonableness as human error (Murply’s Law) is — it just is. Even if you have excellent knowledge and experience.
We live in volatile times.