I have heard that entities like USCCA or equivalent, even though they can provide legal representation, are still insurance companies at their core. Thus, like any other insurance company, they have clauses in their contract that can negate representation based on certain circumstances (like you are seen as at fault). I believe having an actual attorney available is a better option.
I have heard that entities like USCCA or equivalent, even though they can provide legal representation, are still insurance companies at their core. Thus, like any other insurance company, they have clauses in their contract that can negate representation based on certain circumstances (like you are seen as at fault). I believe having an actual attorney available is a better option.
I have heard that entities like USCCA or equivalent, even though they can provide legal representation, are still insurance companies at their core. Thus, like any other insurance company, they have clauses in their contract that can negate representation based on certain circumstances (like you are seen as at fault). I believe having an actual attorney available is a better option.